Solar ‘Nanotrees’ Key To Clean Hydrogen Fuel?

Most research in the field of carbon-friendly solar hydrogen splitting is also bent on finding a substitute for today’s expensive platinum catalyst, which keeps hydrogen fuel cells prohibitively expensive. The options range from Duke University’s idea of producing hydrogen from rooftop solar collectors—glass vacuum tubes filled with water and methanol and catalytic nanoparticles—to Nocera’s cheap cobalt and nickel catalysts.

But in addition to using the future’s plentiful sunlight—and cheap and abundant silicon and zinc oxide nanowires—Wang’s breakthrough also involves a nanoscale structural change in how the sunlight is actually absorbed. This structure is key in improving the efficiency of the process.

uc san diego nanotrees

image via Shutterstock

The trees’ vertical structure and branches are keys to capturing the maximum amount of solar energy.

That’s because the vertical structure of trees grabs and adsorbs light while flat surfaces simply reflect it, Wang said, adding that it is also similar to retinal photoreceptor cells in the human eye. In images of Earth from space, light reflects off flat surfaces such as the ocean or deserts, while forests appear darker.

The vertical branch structure also maximizes hydrogen gas output, said Sun. For example, on the flat, wide surface of a pot of boiling water, bubbles must become large to come to the surface. In the nanotree structure, very small gas bubbles of hydrogen can be extracted much faster, enhancing the surface area by as much as 400,000 times.

Once cheap enough, widespread uses of hydrogen fuel cells would make storing energy much cheaper, in buildings, on the grid, and in vehicles—ranging from cheaper fuel-cell vehicles at military installations on the gas-dependent island of Hawaii—to possibly the most adorable single occupancy vehicle ever designed.

Pages: 1 2

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_J6QTBDK3EQYGAJ33DFJPEKJJNQ AWW

    Nothing about the cost?  How can it be called a “breakthrough?”

    More cheerleading, I guess.

    • Pete Danko

      Indeed, we cheer for scientists doing great research. Unabashedly.

    • Susan Kraemer

      AWW, generally, research at the pure research level is too far from commercialization to estimate the cost in mass production. In rare cases, like when an industry leader the size of a Suntech makes a research advance – then, they can get it into production, and then, the cost (or more typically, cost reduction) IS something that I would cover, as soon as they reveal it.

      But also, in general, efficiency advances are typically cost reductions. Savvy investors find the likeliest to advance. We just don’t know how much of a cost cut till later than the intial “breakthrough” stage. But like Pete says, without great researchers, there’s no great breakthrough, no cost cuts to status quo.

  • abadaba10

    We
    should be using this time to develop green energy, and green jobs. Big Oil keep promoting clean coal, and natural gas, sand tars, and oil and gas fracking operations while saying that photo voltaic, and wind
    doesn’t work. We should be calling them out on this. How about internal
    combustion hydrogen cars? With some injector modification Hydrogen can be fired in a conventional internal
    combustion engine. With this technology hydrogen could have a truly neutral or even a positive effect on reducing carbon in the atmosphere. Long term this is what future investment in fuel technology should look like. Take away the oil companies subsidies and lets get back our environment, and create our ability to produce sustainable energy local. Costs can be worked out at scale just like oil production.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lewis-Goudy/100001589872691 Lewis Goudy

     >Hydrogen can be fired in a conventional internal
    combustion engine.<

    Great stuff once it gets to the engine.  The problem is the fuel tank.  Because it is so light it must be highly compressed to carry much energy per liter of tank.  Because it is so small it will, under high pressure, not only find physical paths through common steel (microporosity) but also dissolve right into the metal and exit to the atmosphere.  It is extremely hazardous (widest explosive range of any flammable gas) and difficult to deal with in terms of bulk transport and storage.  If you are going to go to the trouble of vehicular application it makes more sense to use fuel cells rather than IC engines.  I think the best way to use hydrogen in IC vehicular applications is to dissolve it in propane, which will hold quite a bit of it while remaining easy to deal with.  A propane-fueled plug-in hybrid could use off-peak grid power to enhance range by using dissolved hydrogen as a mezzanine level kwh sink after the on-board battery was fully charged.