Wind Power In New Zealand: Has Its Time Come?

by

Counting just the space used by the turbines, the roads, and the electricity infrastructure, this would use only 0.003 percent of the country’s land.

A similarly rural economy in Iowa expanded wind power using leasing arrangements with farmers to supply over 20 percent of its energy by 2011. But Iowa had passed one of the earliest mandates for a percentage of its energy to come from renewables (in 1983).

New Zealand Wind Energy

image via Shutterstock

There is no similar mandate for a percent of renewables in New Zealand, but merely a target for 90 percent renewable by 2025.

Asked if that lack of a hard mandate will impact New Zealand’s wind prospects, Nigel Parry, communications manager at New Zealand Wind Energy Association, told EarthTechling he did not see it as an impediment. Unlike in the U.S., where the fossil fuel industry has a chokehold on climate policy, the minuscule coal industry in New Zealand does not have similar political power, so he feels a target works as well as a mandate.

Parry said the country has such excellent wind resources that the long run marginal cost of wind is already lower than hydro, geothermal or coal power now, and if gas gets any more expensive, new wind would be cheaper than gas too.

Marginal costs are the determinant of grid priorities in Germany and some other European nations, as well as in Australia. Because the merit order effect gives more weight to low marginal cost “free” fuels in costing power, it gives the advantage to renewables.

He said that while Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicts wind parity globally by 2016, some places – such as New Zealand – are already there due to their excellent wind resources.

As with Iowa, leases could be an additional incentive.

The NZWEA says that wind farm leasing would provide an additional form of revenue for many farmers—delivering over $10 million in annual lease payments by 2030.

“Leases vary,” Parry wrote in an email in response to a question about current earnings from wind farm leases, “but farmers are already earning around NZ$1,500-6,000 ($1,233-$4,932) per MW annually.”

Pages: 1 2

Posted on April 12th, 2012 · Comment ↓

Tags ,

Posted in Editor's Pick, Featured, Renewable Energy, Wind Power

  • Baydolphins2003n

    kiwis are always quietly a few steps ahead of the pack

  • Betsfeeney

    Check out a brand new book that shows the Gulf Oil Spill’s innocent victims being helped by wind energy. It’s called Hole in the Bottom of the Sea, based on a traditional song with all-new lyrics by Christine Lavin: http://www.puddlejumppress.com

  • Rcullen

    I’m fine with huge banks of solar panels, the more the merrier, but this stuff is a desecration of nature and the bankruptcy of astheticism – not to mention a menace to migrating birds. People everywhere should organize against this and a good first objective would be stop governments from susidizing it with grant money.

    • Julian Gwangju

      Rcullen,

      Do you have any links or evidence of the hazard wind turbines pose to birds?
      I’ve never seen any evidence in terms of images, stories, or anything purporting to provide proof of the danger of windmills to birds. My guess is it’s just another fossil fuel industry provided “myth” (read Big Fat Lie).

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G4X4MBI3UXQ4533XZ3A3GRUT24 ty

      Modern designs are not anywhere near as harmful, too bad the first at the subsidy trough were those using scaled up designs from the 70s.

  • Dennis

    Sounds like wind company propaganda. Wind is expensive, unreliable, inconsistent-and electricty cannot be stored. Why a land with hydro, and geothermal would desecrate its countryside with this scam is beyond me. Thus far industrial wind has not resulted in a single conventional power plant being closed-and Denmark which has the largest number per capita-electricity is the highest price in Europe.

    • Sarin

       Dear Dennis,
      Power from wind energy can be stored, cheaply and simply, just by configuring them into a national grid along with hydroelectric power stations. Power production from hydro electric stations are controlled by considering consumption and power from wind farms. thus water in dam can be conserved and just acts like a battery. European union is already doing it.

      • Susan Kraemer

        And many other ways, too. And Siemens is starting to build football-field sized hydrogen electrolylis factories they can put the excess night wind to work in at night, making hydrogen fuel to run cars on. We can adapt to the free, and climate friendly power that wind makes.

      • Susan Kraemer

        California also stores wind energy in pumped storage reservoirs of water, pumped uphill by wind power at night, released to run hydro turbines as needed.

    • Susan Kraemer

      Wind is cheaper than natural gas, in California already actually. The Power Purchase Contracts being signed with wind developers are selling at below MPR (the equivalent cost of nat gas) which varies from 7 to 12 cents a kwh.

    • Julian Gwangju

      Dear Dennis,
      1.) What Sarin said.2.) As stated in the article above, wealthy interests representing the fossil fuel industry in the US (ie. the Koch brothers and co.) are contributing to climate change by controlling the political process by investing heavily in disinformation and bribing politicians. Their propaganda is what you need to be looking at and commenting about.
      3.) If the motor industry was not in league with the fossil fuel industry in the US, then they would not have deliberately sunk their own great initiatives and strides towards making the second great generation of electrical cars (in the 1990s; the first generation was concurrent with or even preceded the first Ford production line vehicles). Batteries do exist which could already provide sources of storage for solar and wind energy local to the average family and individual. It’s a matter of a little more time before infrastructure is in place. I presume that is why fossil fuel industry representatives – such as yourself, I would guess – are so strident in providing an avant guard attack on developing technologies.

    • http://twitter.com/aligatorhardt aligatorhardt

       Anyone can make up assertions.  Fossil fuel power causes cancer, ruins water supplies, and fouls the air. Unlike your assertions, these have been proven many times. Nuclear power is totally unacceptable. and also involves a high carbon footprint from mining, processing, transportation, decommissioning, and waste disposal. In countries where the industry is not allowed to hide it’s prices, the cost is 21 c/kwh, higher than renewables that have no public danger.

  • Mike

    I wish the rich in the US wouldnt get in the way of the US having new ways of power

    • Dennis

      They would lose their campaign donations from oil companies if they got out of the way

  • Brankica

    I don’t understand why
    would somebody be upset about this (specially if one is not N.Z. tax payer).
    I’m actually very excited. Somebody is TRYING something new, risky and exciting
    and you don’t have to fit the bill. They deserve at least a cheer!

  • Devitowhitesell6

    I would just like to refer readers to the following link, where there is much information about industrial wind in Australia, and also all over the world:  
    http://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/wind-turbine-syndrome/article-archive/

    • Susan Kraemer

      That is misinformation, Devil. There is no such thing as wind turbine syndrome. If you can bear the sound your refrigerator makes… that is how loud turbines are at half a mile away.

    • http://twitter.com/aligatorhardt aligatorhardt

      This nonsense has to be addressed every week. There is no medical basis to the hysteria some people create over the presence of wind turbines.
       Shadow Flicker Study Finds No Threat to Health | Special Supplement: Wind Technology Magazine Article

      There is “No Evidence” that Wind Turbine Syndrome Exists, Concludes Expert Panel | ThinkProgress

  • http://twitter.com/aligatorhardt aligatorhardt

    The price of electricity from wind is claimed to be higher than nat gas only because the environmental and health damages from gas are not paid for by the gas power industry. We are already paying more for fossil fuel energy than for renewable energy; the damages are pushed off onto taxpayers instead of attributed to the offenders.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G4X4MBI3UXQ4533XZ3A3GRUT24 ty

    It would be more useful, less harmful to the environment and less expensive if modern designs were used rather than scaled up ones from the 70s.